‘To Hell With You’
By Bishop David A. Zubik
It is really hard to believe that it happened. It comes like a slap in the face. The Obama administration has just told the Catholics of the United States, “To Hell with you!” There is no other way to put it.In early August, the Department for Health and Human Services in the Obama administration released guidelines as part of the implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The guidelines mandated that by Summer 2012 all individual and group health insurance plans, including self-insured plans, cover all FDA-approved contraception, sterilization procedures and pharmaceuticals that even result in abortion.
A million things are wrong with this: equating pregnancy with disease; mandating that every employer pay for contraception procedures including alleged contraceptives that are actually abortion-inducing drugs; forcing American citizens to chose between violating their consciences or providing health care services; mandating such coverage on every individual woman without allowing her to even choose not to have it; forcing every person to pay for that coverage no matter the dictates of their conscience.
Let’s be blunt. This whole process of mandating these guidelines undermines the democratic process itself. In this instance, the mandate declares pregnancy a disease, forces a culture of contraception and abortion on society, all while completely bypassing the legislative process.
This is government by fiat that attacks the rights of everyone – not only Catholics; not only people of all religion. At no other time in memory or history has there been such a governmental intrusion on freedom not only with regard to religion, but even across-the-board with all citizens. It forces every employer to subsidize an ideology or pay a penalty while searching for alternatives to health care coverage. It undermines the whole concept and hope for health care reform by inextricably linking it to the zealotry of pro-abortion bureaucrats.
For our Church this mandate would apply in virtually every instance where the Catholic Church serves as an employer. The mandate would require the Catholic Church as an employer to violate its fundamental beliefs concerning human life and human dignity by forcing Catholic entities to provide contraceptive, sterilization coverage and even pharmaceuticals that result in abortion.
There was a so-called “religious exemption” to the mandate, but it was so narrowly drawn that, as critics charged, Jesus Christ and his Apostles would not fit the exemption. The so-called exemption would only apply to the vast array of Catholic institutions where the following applied:
•Only Catholics are employed;Practically speaking under the proposed mandate there would be no “religious exemption” for Catholic hospitals universities, colleges, nursing homes and numerous Catholic social service agencies such as Catholic Charities. It could easily be determined that the “religious exemption” would not apply as well to Catholic high schools, elementary schools and Catholic parishes since many employ non-Catholics and serve both students and, through social outreach, many who do not share Catholic religious beliefs. Such a narrow “religious exemption” is simply unprecedented in federal law.
•The primary purpose of the institution or service provided is the direct instruction in Catholic belief;
•The only persons served by the institution are those that share Catholic religious tenets. (Try to fit this in with our local Catholic Charities that serve 80,000 every year without discrimination according to faith. It would be impossible!)
Last September I asked you to protest those guidelines to Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of the U.S. Department for Health and Human Services, and contact your political leadership in the federal government. I asked that you request that this flawed mandate be withdrawn because of its unprecedented interference in the religious liberty and freedom of conscience of the Catholic community, and our basic democratic process.
You did. And you were joined by Catholics throughout the country (and many others as well) who raised their voices against the mandate, raised their voices against a meaningless religious exemption.
On January 20, 2012, the Obama administration answered you and me. The response was very simple: “To Hell with You.”
Kathleen Sebelius announced that the mandate would not be withdrawn and the religious exemption would not be expanded. Instead, she stated that nonprofit groups – which include the Catholic Church – will get a year “to adapt to this new rule.” She simply dismissed Catholic concerns as standing in the way of allegedly respecting the health concerns and choices of women.
Could Catholics be insulted any more, suggesting that we have no concern for women’s health issues? The Catholic Church and the Catholic people have erected health care facilities that are recognized worldwide for their compassionate care for everyone regardless of their creed, their economic circumstances and, most certainly, their gender. In so many parts of the globe – the United States included – the Church is health care.
Kathleen Sebelius and through her, the Obama administration, have said “To Hell with You” to the Catholic faithful of the United States.
•To Hell with your religious beliefs,We’ll give you a year, they are saying, and then you have to knuckle under. As Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan, archbishop of New York and president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops responded, “in effect, the president is saying that we have a year to figure out how to violate our consciences.”
•To Hell with your religious liberty,
•To Hell with your freedom of conscience.
As I wrote to you last September, with this mandate the democratic process is being ignored while we are being ordered to ignore our religious beliefs. And we are being told not only to violate our beliefs, but to pay directly for that violation; to subsidize the imposition of a contraceptive and abortion culture on every person in the United States.
It is time to go back to work. They have given us a year to adapt to this rule. We can’t! We simply cannot!
Write to the president.
Write to Secretary Sebelius.
Write to our Senators.
Write to those in Congress.
Use the PA Catholic Advocacy Network to send an email message, too.
I have included the addresses in a box accompanying this article. Here’s what you can write:
"Dear (Representative):
“In early August, the Department for Health and Human Services released guidelines that would force Catholic institutions to subsidize through their health care plans contraception, sterilization procedures and pharmaceuticals that even result in abortion.
“It was announced on January 20thby Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of the U.S. Department for Health and Human Services, that this mandate is affirmed and that non-profit institutions, including the Catholic Church, have one year to adapt to the mandate.
“This is a direct threat to the religious liberty of Catholics, freedom of conscience and the social service ministry of the Catholic Church. The so-called ‘religious exemption’ in the mandate is no exemption at all as it would require any Catholic institution (that serves non-Catholics or employs non-Catholics) to violate Catholic belief, discontinue to provide health care, or close its doors.
“I ask that you do all possible to rescind the ‘Preventive Service Mandate’ as an unprecedented federal interference in the right of Catholics to serve their community without violating their fundamental moral beliefs.”
This mandate can be changed by Congressional pressure. The only way that action will happen is if you and I take action.
Let them know that you and I will not allow ourselves to be pushed around (or worse yet) be dismissed because of our Catholic faith.
Let them know that you and I will not allow our religious freedom to be compromised.
Let them know that you and I will not allow our religious liberty to be rescinded.
Nobody, not even the president of the United States or anyone who represents him, has the right to say to you and to me as U.S. citizens, as Catholics, or as both: “To Hell with You.”
The president and our elected leaders need to hear from you and me and to listen to us NOW.
And if NOT now, HOW can we get the president to listen to us???










11 comments:
Bishop Zubik claims Obama is saying "the hell with you". Here's how Zubik says "the hell with you".
It was proven that a pedophile priest in Zubik's diocese raped a child. The church begrudgingly agreed to pay for therapy for the child, who thought he was raped by Christ (since they teach children that a priest is Christ on earth).
Zubik decided to prematurely cut off the therapy against the advice of the victims, and the victim, Michael Unglo, committed suicide.
Zubik saved money, and the Catholic church was responsible for the death of someone they raped as a child.
When you go before God, every one of you will answer for why you didn't do more for these victims.
To provide some background to my readers regarding the allegations made above by "PatO":
Pittsburgh diocese sued over suicide
By Brian Bowling, PITTSBURGH TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Friday, July 30, 2010
(http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/breaking/s_692540.html)
Bishop David Zubik broke a promise to Michael Unglo, a broken promise that led the former Etna resident to commit suicide in May, his brother Sam Unglo said Thursday.
Unglo, as executor of his brother's estate, filed a negligence lawsuit against Zubik and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh. The diocese in March quit paying for therapy Michael Unglo received to help him cope with memories of his sexual abuse by a priest for three years, starting when he was 10 years old, according to the lawsuit.
In their last conversation, Michael Unglo emphasized how much pain he felt and said he couldn't understand why the diocese abandoned him, his brother said.
"He was in great despair," Sam Unglo said.
The Rev. Ron Lengwin, spokesman for the diocese, said the church did not abandon Unglo.
"We don't believe that we were responsible for his suicide. We just can't accept that any action of the diocese contributed to his death," he said.
From June 2008 to March, the church paid more than $300,000 for Unglo's treatments. Several times during that period, the church questioned whether it needed to quit paying before the family provided evidence that treatment was needed, Lengwin said.
"It was a matter of reviewing that issue with the family," he said.
The lawsuit says the diocese in March sent Unglo a "final release" of $75,000 and noted "no further services or treatment would be provided for by the diocese."
Lengwin said he didn't know the details of the letter sent to Unglo, but insisted the diocese never refused to consider additional money.
"We were always open throughout this process, to respond to any real need that could be demonstrated to us," he said.
(continues)
(continued)
Attorney Alan Perer, representing the Unglo family, couldn't be reached to respond to Lengwin's statement. Earlier yesterday, he said the diocese effectively put Unglo on life support and then pulled the plug by making a "reckless, negligent decision to cut off necessary funding for his treatment."
Michael Unglo, 39, was attending All Saints Church in Etna in 1982 when former priest Richard Dorsch began abusing him, the lawsuit says.
Sam Unglo said his brother didn't tell anyone until 1993 or 1994, when Dorsch was arrested and convicted of molesting another child. Even then, his brother minimized what happened and said he wanted to get on with his life, Unglo said.
The family didn't suspect anything was seriously wrong until Michael Unglo attempted suicide June 20, 2008, Sam Unglo said. Perer said doctors told Unglo that lingering effects of his abuse were overwhelming him, and he was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. He was being treated at Austen Riggs Center in Stockbridge, Mass., when he committed suicide May 4.
Perer said the lawsuit is based on a premise similar to Good Samaritan laws -- that the diocese knew there was "a high likelihood that terrible results would occur" after sending the final release. The lawyer said he's unaware of any similar lawsuit going to trial, but he's not aware of any situation with similar circumstances.
The diocese's actions are particularly reprehensible because it pays support to Dorsch, Perer said.
Lengwin said the diocese provides Dorsch, 65, with $1,000 monthly. In 1994, the church barred him from functioning as or representing himself as a priest, and the stipend does not mean the church condones his actions or doubts the credibility of his accusers, Lengwin said.
David Clohessy, national director of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, said SNAP doesn't disagree with the idea of the church's housing and monitoring pedophile priests, but he doesn't believe any diocese can credibly argue that it lacks enough money to pay for a victim's treatment.
"It's just incredibly coldhearted to essentially say to a deeply wounded victim, 'Take this check and leave us alone,' which is basically what Pittsburgh's bishop did," Clohessy said.
@Pato said: "When you go before God, every one of you will answer for why you didn't do more for these victims."
If only you knew the weight of conscience I take every night to bed for things deeds I've done, thoughts I've had, words I've said or things left undone, and not only I but millions of other conscientious Catholics, perhaps you would've measured your words better. Add to that the sins committed by Catholics of all ranks and then one begins to understand the term "mystery of iniquity".
May your conscience be clearer than mine before the Lord when your turn comes to render an account.
+JMJ,
-Theo
To the anonymous troll who left a comment loaded with sacrilege and coprolalia on this post, (fully knowing that I would not publish it and therefore, aimed at me in order to upset and hurt me): all you are achieving is that I now will pray for your liberation from the dark, sick, and infrahuman spiritual bondage you suffer from.
+JMJ,
Theo
TIL what "coprolalia" means :)
There appears to be a strong correlation between "New Atheists" (or what I call 'lazy atheists' in that they don't do any homework) and coprolalia.
I see on the PA Catholic Advocacy website one of the tabs (links) a the top is for 'Social Justice'. When, O God, when will these stupid Catholics figure out that the social justice campaign was the vector used by the the enemies of the Church to bring us to this point? What we have have here is the bitter fruit of decades of playing footsy with the Democrats and the social justice crowd. The idiot bishops who went gaga over social justice have brought us to this point.
@Anonymous: Well, problem is, there is such a thing as Social Justice. We can all read about it in the Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church.
Although the subject of complicity by the American Catholic faithful with Democrat policies in the last 20 years is a fair question to raise, by insulting them, you will not persuade them. I suppose that's what you wish to accomplish, persuade them, right?
+JMJ,
-Theo
The appeals court agreed an Allegheny County judge was right to dismiss the lawsuit because 39-year-old Michael Unglo was suicidal before, during and after the church paid for his counseling. As a result, the courts agreed the church wasn't negligent in Unglo's death
http://www.wtae.com/news/29350908/detail.html#ixzz1kwbFPnaXhttp://www.wtae.com/news/29350908/detail.html
The said pedophile priest Richard Dorsch was never been charged in the case of Unglo, but of another boy of 13 years old who said this priest kissed his neck and fondled him during an excursion at North Park in 1981, and for which actions the priest Dorsch got jail time and quit priesthood.
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news3/1995_06_23_Ackerman_PriestGets_Richard_Dorsch_4.htm
Rape's legal definition has been changed in january 2012 to accommodate Vice President Joe Biden. It seems to me that many journalists, as Brian Bowling in Pittsburg Tribune Review in his article cited above, used the term "rape" regularly in spite of the fact that the event could not be classified as "rape" in its prevous legal definition, especially apparently when the suspect is a priest.
http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/06/change-in-fbi-rape-definition-bolsters-bidens-controversial-rape-claims/
@Denise: good information, thanks.
It is undeniable that the sex-abuse scandal has given the Church-haters new ammunition to attack the Church, and a figleaf to cover their real aims which is to destroy the Church.
Their is no longer an outrage at the behavior we're excising, but also a quest to destroy the Church's moral witness in the public arena and to prostrate her financially.
It is a demonic vicious cycle and the Church-haters play their part with glee.
+JMJ,
-Theo
Post a Comment