Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Atheists: an endangered subspecies

Brethren, Peace and Good to all of you in Christ Jesus. This, from The Vatican Insider:

The figures published by the agency “Analisis Digital”, showed if we compare current figures with those from 1970, the height of the “sexual revolution” in the Western world and of communist atheism in Eastern Europe, we see that in 41, years atheism has lost 28 million followers.

In return, the number of non-religious individuals has gone up by more than one hundred million.

With the fall of communist regimes many of those who, for reasons of political and cultural expediency, particularly in Eastern European countries, declared themselves “atheist”, because state atheism was favoured by the various regimes (Moscow established the Institute and Museum of Scientific Atheism, to mention one example), went for the less bold option and preferred to plead non-religious.

Likewise, in China, after the devastating wave of the “Cultural Revolution” with all its human and cultural disasters, many people today prefer to declare themselves non-religious rather than atheist.

In any case, in the mid Twenty-first century, atheists and non-believers seem to be heading towards a definite decline.

In some cases they convert to a religion, albeit in a very superficial manner, (and this often seems to be the case of millions of people in Eastern Europe, especially in Russia, where there is a particular tendency to subscribe to the Orthodox faith with a return to traditional forms of worship). Many older people die leaving practically no children and therefore do not “transmit” faith in the non-faith.

On the contrary, religions are flourishing in the twenty-first century, with no exception. Even Judaism which accounts for a tiny minority. Which had little more than fifteen million members in 1970; less than 14 million reported in 2000, but now appears to be recovering with numbers returning to what they were forty years ago.

Christianity, in all its possible variants, totals two billion three hundred million followers, and is growing more than any other faith: according to the calculations made by the study, more than 83 thousand faithful come under the sign of the Cross. Following close behind, of course, is Islam. There are almost one billion six hundred thousand followers of the Prophet Muhammad throughout the world, and numbers are increasing at the speed of 79 thousand every 24 hours. Hinduism is in third place. Its believers add up to 952 million, who live primarily in India, but also in neighbouring parts of Asia. And this faith is growing at a rate of 37 thousand followers per day. Still in Asia, although present in statistically small numbers elsewhere, is Buddhism. At the global level, there are about 468 million followers of various “routes”, which are increasing at a rate of 13,800 per day. Taoism is a predominantly Chinese faith, but thanks to the country’s total figures, it holds an important place among religions, coming just below Buddhism. Taoism has 457 million followers who have survived all the political and religious climates of their homeland and are increasing at a rate of 9,300 new followers every day. Lastly, we have the planet’s countless “ethnic” religions, which encompass 269 million people from many different creeds. This category is growing at a rate of 9 thousand per day.
Read the entire article here.

Commentary. No wonder the neo-atheist evangelists are so cranky! Their subspecies is in danger of extinction! Not to worry. The Lord will permit some to linger to serve as a warning to others.

Saturday, November 26, 2011

Book Review: “The Father’s Tale: A Novel” by Michael O’Brien

This year of Our Lord 2011 has been a very challenging to our family. Among the many challenges we’ve faced was one very trying one, one which brought my dignity and my self-identity as a father into question.

To make the story short, the series of events left me thinking that I have failed as a father to one of my sons, that I was unsuccessful in handing down the faith, the way to live a Christian life, to hold on to a holy marriage, to respect the sacraments and the life of grace. Surely it was my fault that he had to look elsewhere for what I failed to give him.

Michael O’Brien’s book, The Father's Tale: A Novel , was brought to me as a healing balm, as just the medicine that the doctor ordered.

The Father's Tale: A Novel is the story of a man about my age, father of two sons like I am, and one of them went astray. The father, Alexander Graham by name, a reclusive widower and bookstore keeper, resigned to die. He left everything behind, his bucolic Canadian town, his shop, his friends, and his eldest son, starting a desperate race against time and distance to bring his youngest son, his stray lamb, back into the fold.

Spanning Great Britain, Finland, the entire length of Russia and beyond, Mr. O’Brien gives us a tour de force that includes music, poetry, revolution; as well as deepest darkness and incredible light. We see Alex Graham’s heart expand, then break, and then expand into greater love.

Two takeaways from this book, the first one a lesson taught also in several other books by Mr. O’Brien which I have read, and that is that the battle against evil is not going to be won by any human means at our disposal. No one knows can begin to image how the battle will be won, but it will be won. In fact, it has been won already.

The second lesson reminds me of words spoken by the Francis character in Brother Sun, Sister Moon: there no more sons, there are no more fathers. But Alex Graham went deeper into his meditation, discovering that fathers will become sons and sons, fathers and above all of them, Our Father who is in heaven.

My father passed recently and I realized that I never told him directly that I loved him, and in my own ruminations I found out that, although I knew I loved God the Father, and He knew too, I never did in fact, ever told God that I love Him. For the first time in a long time, the images of both fatherhoods, that of my father, and that of my God, fused. I finally found the Source of the stream, from which all fatherhood in heaven and on earth take the name and before Whom I bend the knee.

The Father's Tale: A Novel did that for me and also reassured me that everything will be alright, everything will turn out alright. God our Father will see to it, and what I have handed down to my son s will endure.

If this book brought me to these realizations, imagine what it could do for you!

There is more, but I will not tell you anything more. I want you to find out. Read The Father's Tale: A Novel .

Thursday, November 24, 2011

Music: “Let all things now living” – Michael Card


Let all things now living, a song of thanksgiving…


I wish you all a Happy Thanksgiving from Afghanistan.
May the Lord bless all of us this day and forever!

Salvation Is Decided in Practice

Father Nicolas Schwizer

In the book of Isaiah in the Old Testament, the gathering of all nations, languages and races into one chosen people is announced. In the New Testament, Jesus tells his countrymen that foreigners will come from the North, the South, the East and the West… to sit at the table of the Kingdom of God.

This universality of God’s salvation still leaves us without knowing anything about the number of those to be saved. It is enough for us to know that God calls everyone, that the door which leads to the Kingdom is narrow and can close at anytime. What is most important is the conversion to the Gospel. Everything else is simply curiosity which distracts us dangerously.

The Gospel is salvation for those who listen to it responsibly, be they or not descendants of Abraham or Catholics from birth. To listen responsibly to the Gospel is to live it and to practice it in daily life.

And this is nothing easy. Therefore, Jesus says that the door is narrow and that only those who strive will enter through it into the Kingdom of God.

It is not enough to listen to sermons or to go to Mass every Sunday. Acts of piety are not what will save us. All of these things have their value, but only when they help us and motivate us to live our faith in daily life: in our personal and family life, our social and professional life, our life in politics…..

On the last day, the Lord will recognize only those who here and now recognize Him in mankind. To recognize Jesus in mankind is to recognize the dignity of each human being, to respect his/her rights, to be aware of his/her needs and, above all, to be in solidarity with the poor, the marginalized, the oppressed. Whatever we do for one of these, we do it for the Lord himself.

“The last will be first and the first will be last.” The great Judgement Day will come, and then the implacable surprise will come on the many who thought they were the true Christians.

And these who considered themselves the first will say: “Lord, open the door for us.” And the Lord will answer them: “I do not know who you are.” And they will begin to say: “We have eaten your bread and drank your blood, your Gospel has been preached in our churches.” But the remembrance of all these religious practices will be of no use – if they are not accompanied by the truly decisive proof in justice: from love for others, especially to those most in need.

The great Judgement Day will come and happily will also come the surprise about many men and women from the East, West, North and South. They are those who practiced in the world the Christian message of love. Therefore, the Lord will open the door to them, He will sit them at his table and will say to them: “Come, blessed of my Father, the Kingdom is yours…..

Because I was hungry and you fed Me; I was thirsty and you gave me to drink; I was a pilgrim and you sheltered Me…”

Frequently, the first for God are the last for mankind…..because God does not judge according to appearances, He looks at the heart.

There is an official Christianity which is good when it authentically expresses in words and deeds the attitudes of faith, hope and love – but it is vain hypocrisy when it is not this way. However, there is another nameless Christianity, anonymous, which does not express itself in rituals and words, but achieves in life the message of Christ.

Christian truth is eminently practical. It consists in the conversion of mankind toward a new order in which there is justice, peace, fraternity and love. The men and women who work for these values will be saved and will ascend to the first places.

Dear brothers and sisters, let us strive so that God can find us also among them, and allows us to enter his Heavenly Kingdom.

Questions for reflection

1. How do I live my Christianity during the week?

2. What are the things I do for those most in need?

3. Is my Christianity noticeable in my work environment, family environment…?

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

So, you want to become a Doctor of the Church?

Brethren, Peace and Good to you in Jesus' Name.

I've known some people that really like pursuing academic degrees, doctoral and post-doctoral studies, fellowships, etc. The most ambitious may even aim at this "Doctor of the Church" degree, probably granted by the Angelicum or the Gregorian in Rome. Uh, no. Though not unattainable, the requirements are pretty stringent.

The title "Doctor of the Church" is a title that the Church confers to men and women whose teaching present the Catholic Christian faith clearly and beautifully, exerting a great, salutary effect upon the entire Church for generations.

Then, are we talking about a huge academic thesis here presented to a solemn panel composed of Jesuits and Dominicans? Not quite. In order to become a Doctor of the Church you must:

  • First, be dead. Yep, the first board that will interview the candidate is out of this world. The candidate must be dead because death is a prerrequisite for the next requirement.

  • You must be a canonized saint. That means that the candidate must've lived the Catholic Christian faith to a heroic degree, and not merely ordinarily, like you and I are endeavoring to live it. That also means that the candidate is not "degreed" for merely having "book knowledge," but also - and perhaps, principally - for being a special reflection of Christ to others in the Church and beyond. There are no "venerables" in this league - except for "the Venerable Bede" who is really "St. Bede, the Venerable" - of beatified Catholics among these ranks, only canonized saints that are examples to the universal Church for their holiness of their life and the wisdom that only comes from the Holy Spirit.

  • Your writings must have had a profound impact upon the ways the Christian faithful receive, understand, and live out the Gospel. Your writings must be free from doctrinal error and preeminent in their view of the spiritual life. The volume of writing is irrelevant: St. Augustine of Hippo wrote over a hundred works; St. Therese of Lisieux only wrote one and yet both are Doctors of the Church. Long after the writings of say, Hans Küng are dry-rotting, long forgotten in old libraries, Christians will still pore over St. Therese's Story of a Soul, studying her "Little Way" to holiness. That's what the writing of a Doctor of the Church does, it moves his or her readers to pursue the path of holiness, to be extraordinary in the ordinary, for holiness is the normative life of a Christian, for all of us and not only for an elite few.

  • You must wait a while to receive the title from the Militant Church. For St. Catherine of Siena it took 590 years but for St. Therese it only took 100 years which is a rather short time. But you will be in heaven, so the wait will be a jiffy for you!
  • If you meet all the qualifications, you can indeed become a Doctor of the Church with the grace of God. It is a worthy goal and if you ask for this gift, the Lord may indeed grant it to you. You would become part of an elite that meets in heaven!

    There have been 33 men and women declared Doctors of the Church, with St. Juan de Avila soon to follow as the 34th as soon as the Holy Father Benedict XVI decides when. The list follows in alphabetical order:
    •St. Albertus Magnus (1200-80) - Added by Pope Pius XI in 1931

    •St. Alphonsus Liguori (1696-1787) - Added by Blessed Pope Pius IX in 1871

    •Saint Ambrose (340-97) - One of the original four Doctors of the Latin Church

    •Saint Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109) - Added by Pope Clement XI in 1720

    •Saint Anthony of Padua (1195-1231) - Added by Pope Pius XII in 1946

    •Saint Athanasius (297-373) - One of the original four Doctors of the Eastern Church

    •Saint Augustine of Hippo (354-430) - One of the original four Doctors of the Latin Church

    •Saint Basil the Great (329-379) - One of the original four Doctors of the Eastern Church

    •The Venerable Bede (673-735) - Added by Pope Leo XIII in 1899

    •Saint Bernard of Clairvaux (1090-1153) - Added by Pope Pius VIII in 1830

    •Saint Bonaventure (1217-74) - Added by Pope Sixtus V in 1588

    •Saint Catherine of Siena (1347-80) - Added by Pope Paul VI in 1970

    •Saint Cyril of Alexandria (376-444) - Added by Pope Leo XIII in 1883

    •Saint Cyril of Jerusalem (315-87) - Added by Pope Leo XIII in 1883

    •Saint Ephrem the Syrian (306-73) - Added by Pope Benedict XV in 1920

    •St. Francis de Sales (1567-1622) - Added by Blessed Pope Pius IX in 1877

    •Pope Saint Gregory the Great (540-604) - One of the original four Doctors of the Latin Church

    •St. Gregory Nazianzen (330-90) - One of the original four Doctors of the Eastern Church

    •Saint Hilary of Poitiers (315-68) - Added by Blessed Pope Pius IX in 1851

    •Saint Isidore of Seville (560-636) - Added by Pope Innocent XIII in 1722

    •Saint Jerome (343-420) - One of the original four Doctors of the Latin Church

    •St. John Chrysostom (347-407) - One of the original four Doctors of the Eastern Church

    •St. John Damascene (675-749) - Added by Pope Leo XIII in 1883

    •Saint John of the Cross (1542-91) - Added by Pope Pius XI in 1926

    •Saint Lawrence of Brindisi (1559-1619) - Added by Blessed Pope John XXIII in 1959

    •Pope Saint Leo the Great (400-61) - Added by Pope Benedict XIV in 1754

    •St. Peter Canisius (1521-97) - Added by Pope Pius XI in 1925

    •St. Peter Chrysologus (400-50) - Added by Pope Benedict XIII in 1729

    •St. Peter Damian (1007-72) - Added by Pope Leo XII in 1828

    •St. Robert Bellarmine (1542-1621) - Added by Pope Pius XI in 1931

    •Saint Teresa of Avila (1515-82) - Added by Pope Paul VI in 1970

    •Saint Therese of Lisieux (1873-97) - Added by Pope John Paul II in 1997

    •St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-74) - Added by Pope Saint Pius V in 1568
    Could you think of other candidates? I say Blessed Pope John Paul, whom I also think will be called "the Great" by the Church in the future. Like Sts. Leo and Gregory the Great, he would also be part of another elite, but that's a blog post for another time.

    Monday, November 21, 2011

    Prayer of Abandonment

    Brethren, Peace and good to all of you in Jesus' Name. Today, I feel a special need to pray this prayer composed by Bl. Charles de Foucauld. I had published it here before, but today I know I must prayer. When you pray today, would you pray for my intentions known to me and the Father? I'll be appreciative and thankful if you do.

    Father,
    I abandon myself into your hands;
    do with me what you will.
    Whatever you may do, I thank you:
    I am ready for all, I accept all.

    Let only your will be done in me,
    and in all your creatures -
    I wish no more than this, O Lord.

    Into your hands I commend my soul:
    I offer it to you with all the love of my heart,
    for I love you, Lord, and so need to give myself,
    to surrender myself into your hands without reserve,
    and with boundless confidence,
    for you are my Father.

    Sunday, November 20, 2011

    Long live Christ the King!

    Brethren, peace and good to you all in the name of our King, whose royal feast we observe today.

    Pope Pius XI universally instituted The Feast of Christ the King in 1925 in his encyclical Quas Primas. Pope Pius connected the denial of Christ as king to the rise of secularism. At the time of Quas Primas, secularism was on the rise, and many Christians, even Catholics, were doubting Christ's authority, as well as the Church's, and even doubting Christ's existence. Pius XI, and the rest of the Christian world, witnessed the rise of dictatorships in Europe, and saw Catholics being taken in by these earthly leaders. Just as the Feast of Corpus Christi was instituted when devotion to the Eucharist was at a low point, the Feast of Christ the King was instituted during a time when respect for Christ and the Church was waning, when the feast was most needed. In fact, it is still needed today, as these problems have not vanished, but instead have worsened.

    Pius hoped the institution of the feast would have various effects. They were:
    1. That nations would see that the Church has the right to freedom, and immunity from the state (Quas Primas, 32).

    2. That leaders and nations would see that they are bound to give respect to Christ (Quas Primas, 31).

    3. That the faithful would gain strength and courage from the celebration of the feast, as we are reminded that Christ must reign in our hearts, minds, wills, and bodies (Quas Primas, 33).
    Today, the same distrust of authority exists, although the problem has gotten worse. Individualism has been embraced to such an extreme, that for many, the only authority is the individual self. The idea of Christ as ruler is rejected in such a strongly individualistic system. Also, many balk at the idea of kings and queens, believing them to be oppressive. Some even reject the titles of "lord" and "king" for Christ because they believe that such titles are borrowed from oppressive systems of government. However true these statements might be (some kings have been oppressive), these individuals miss the point: Christ's kingship is one of humility and service. Jesus said:
    You know that those who are recognized as rulers over the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones make their authority over them felt. But it shall not be so among you. Rather, whoever wishes to become great among you will be your servant; whoever wishes to be first among you will be the slave of all. For the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many (Mark 10:42-45, NAB).
    and
    Pilate said to Jesus, "Are you the King of the Jews?"... Jesus answered, "My kingdom does not belong to this world. If my kingdom did belong to this world, my attendants would be fighting to keep me from being handed over to the Jews. But as it is, my kingdom is not here." So Pilate said to him, "Then you are a king?" Jesus answered, "You say I am a king. For this I was born and for this I came into the world,to testify to the truth (John 18:33b, 36-37).
    Thus, Jesus knew the oppressive nature of secular kings, and in contrast to them, he connected his role as king to humble service, and commanded his followers to be servants as well. In other passages of Scripture, his kingdom is tied to his suffering and death. While Christ is coming to judge the nations, his teachings spell out a kingdom of justice and judgment balanced with radical love, mercy, peace, and forgiveness. When we celebrate Christ as King, we are not celebrating an oppressive ruler, but one willing to die for humanity and whose "loving-kindness endures forever." Christ is the king that gives us true freedom, freedom in Him. Thus we must never forget that Christ radically redefined and transformed the concept of kingship.

    Christ the King Sunday used to be celebrated on the last Sunday of October, but since the calendar reforms of 1969, the feast falls on the last Sunday of Ordinary Time, which is the Sunday before Advent. It is fitting that the feast celebrating Christ's kingship is observed right before Advent, when we liturgically wait for the promised Messiah (King).

    Source: All About Christ the King Sunday

    Thursday, November 17, 2011

    California Supreme Court upholds citizen defense of Proposition 8

    Brethren, Peace and Good to you in the name of Jesus. This piece according to Deacon Keith Fournier of Catholic.org:

    SACRAMENTO, CA (Catholic Online) - I remember the day Judge Vaughan Walker's opinion striking down Proposition 8 was released, August 4, 2010. The crowds outside the Courthouse waved homosexual Rainbow flags and signs emblazoned with the latest popular slogan of the Homosexual Equivalency movement "All Love is Equal".

    The mistaken opinion was a foregone conclusion. Judge Walker had heard 13 days of testimony and legal arguments in his review of California's Proposition 8. He signaled his leanings many times throughout the trial. The proposition declared marriage to be what it is, a union between a man and a woman. It was properly passed by 7 million Californians. The Judge did not like the Proposition.

    Questions were raised concerning his impartiality. He was rumored to be a practicing homosexual who was living with his male paramour. However, this was deemed to be irrelevant. Months after issuing a 138 page opinion - which the homosexual equivalency movement viewed as a great accomplishment in their cultural revolution - the judge retired and later told reporters he was homosexual and had been living with a male doctor for ten years.

    In Walker's opinion he wrote: "Proposition 8 fails to advance any rational basis in singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license. Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite-sex couples are superior to same-sex couples. Because California has no interest in discriminating against gay men and lesbians, and because Proposition 8 prevents California from fulfilling its constitutional obligation to provide marriages on an equal basis, the court concludes that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional."

    In an act of judicial imperialism, Judge Walker set aside Proposition 8. He also became an icon for the New Cultural Revolution, lending the authority of his judicial office to a fringe group who opposed the will of the people and the truth confirmed by the Natural Law about the nature of authentic Marriage. He succumbed to the mistaken notion that his judicial office gave him the ability to change the structure of reality...
    Please, continue reading here.

    Commentary. Legalized same-sex Californication must now wait, as the Supreme Court of that state, answered a question from the 9th Circuit recognizing a citizen's right to defend an approved voter measure when the governor and attorney general of said state fail to defend the law. Deacon Fournier is skeptical of the 9th Circuit ability or desire to uphold Proposition 8 in California, as am I. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court of California lacked the will to gut democracy completely in their state and that is good.

    Mark my words: there is no natural right for a person to marry someone of the same sex and therefore, all human positive law seeking to undermine or nullify the order God has placed in nature cannot bind the consciences of the faithful. Catholic Christians are bound in conscience to disobey those unjust laws whenever they are forced to comply with them and to work actively to change them.

    Tuesday, November 15, 2011

    Iranian leaders seek to hasten the End of Days

    Brethren, Peace and Good to you in Jesus Christ. I was reading this opinion piece by Joel Rosenberg published in Fox News:

    Why would Iran authorize a major terrorist operation on American soil? Skeptics say the much-discussed “foiled” Iranian plot makes no sense. We will know soon enough if the Feds have sufficient evidence related to this specific plot. But Iranian leaders may, in fact, have a motive to accelerate direct attacks on the U.S.: Shia Islamic eschatology, or "End Times" theology.

    Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are convinced that the End of Days has come. They believe the Shia messiah known as the “Twelfth Imam” or the “Mahdi” will appear soon to establish a global Islamic kingdom known as the caliphate.

    What’s more, they believe the way to hasten the coming of the Twelfth Imam is to annihilate Israel (which they call the “Little Satan”), and the United States (which they call the “Great Satan”). We should not, therefore, be surprised that Iran is probing for weaknesses in American intelligence and homeland security.

    Khamenei told Iranians in July 2010 that he personally met with the Twelfth Imam. He also claimed to be the personal representative of the Mahdi on earth, and said all Muslims must “obey him.” Meanwhile, Western intelligence agencies say he continues to work with Ahmadinejad and the Iranian military to develop nuclear warheads and the ballistic missiles to deliver them.

    Read it all here.

    According to Mr. Rosenberg on a blog post on his site, the U.N. report concludes there is “credible” evidence that:

      1. Iran is systematically enriching nuclear fuel towards military applications.
      2. Iran — since the late-1970s — has been building clandestine nuclear facilities to evade international detection.
      3. Iran’s nuclear program no longer run by civilians but by the Ministry of Defense.
      4. Iran is steadily developing nuclear warheads.
      5. Iran is developing long-range ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear warheads against her enemies.
      6. Iran has made preparations to test its first nuclear bomb.
      7. Iran did not cease developing military applications for its nuclear program in 2003, as the CIA reported in its controversial National Intelligence Estimate in 2007, but rather accelerated its efforts to develop the Bomb.

    A New York Times editorial page also  concluded that “the report is chillingly comprehensive. It says that Iran created computer models of nuclear explosions, conducted experiments on nuclear triggers and did advanced research on a warhead that could be delivered by a medium-range missile. What gives the report particular credibility is its meticulous sourcing. The agency’s director, Yukiya Amano, built a case on more than a thousand pages of documents, the assistance of more than 10 agency member states and interviews with ‘a number of individuals who were involved in relevant activities in Iran.’”

    Analysis. First, a caveat: Mr. Rosenberg is a pre-Millennial Evangelical Christian with his own eschatological agenda, with which I don’t agree either. Having said that, this opinion piece is valid, as far as I’m concerned, and specially problematic. From my viewpoint I must insist that the Iranian regime lies, misleads, and obfuscates about the true purpose, size, and location of its nuclear program and that it in fact is pursuing nuclear weapons, despite their numerous disclaimers.

    The reason why the Iranian regime must not be trusted lies on its own religious principles:  this is called taqiyya which in the Iranian view of Shi’a Islam may be called "dissimulation" which is use of word or actions tending to mislead one's opponents. (Source). The consequences of this theological stance translates into instant mistrust for non-Islamic dialogue partners in the international arena. In fact, I believe that a lot of the anger held by Iranian leaders derives from the West’s reluctance to bite. How can we pursue an honest dialogue with the regime when the core of its religious-political ideology embraces the concept of strategic dishonesty?

    The fact that the regime wants to trigger its version of Cosmic War is also troublesome, for in their view, “God” justifies their means for their ends. This should concerns us all, for I foresee a regional conflagration is and when the regime decides to attack Israel with nuclear or radiological weapons, one that may engulf regional US partners and that may lead to the extinction not only of the Iranian regime, but also of Persian civilization. This may happen if in their apocalyptic calculus, the ayatollahs and their minions conclude that they have little to lose and everything to gain to trigger the coming of their “twelfth imam.”

    Behold, then, how a false religion can inform a culture and a civilization to commit mass-murder and ultimately, suicide, these would force “God” to act.

    Monday, November 14, 2011

    En route to the Outeremer again

    Brethren, peace be eith you. Thank you all for your thoughts and prayers on my father's passing. We appreciate them.

    Having finished my emergency leave to say good bye and be with my family, I'm returning to my military duty in Afghanistan. I'll post something as soon as I'm able. Please, enjoy the material already available here and thank you for finding this humble eork worthy of your ocassional attention.

    Friday, November 11, 2011

    Today, Veterans’ Day, We Remember St. Martin de Tours, Patron Saint of Soldiers

    Source: EWTN

    St. Martin, called "the glory of Gaul," was born about the year 316 of pagan parents in Sabaria, Upper Pannonia, a province comprising northern Yugoslavia and western Hungary. His father was an officer in the Roman army who had risen from the ranks. While Martin was still a child, his father was transferred to a new station in Pavia, north Italy. Here the boy learned of Christianity, felt drawn to it, and became a catechumen. As the son of a veteran, at the age of fifteen he was required to begin service in the army. Though never shirking his military duty, he is said to have lived more like a monk than a soldier.

    Young Martin was stationed at Amiens, in Gaul, when the incident occurred which tradition and art have rendered so famous. As he rode towards the town one winter day, he noticed near the gates a poor man, thinly clad, shivering with cold, and begging alms. Martin saw that none who passed stopped to help the miserable fellow. He had nothing with him but the clothes he wore, but, drawing his sword from its scabbard, he cut his great woolen cloak in two pieces, gave one half to the beggar, and wrapped himself in the other. The following night, the story continues, Martin in his sleep saw Jesus Christ, surrounded by angels, and dressed in the half of the cloak he had given away. A voice bade him look at it well and say whether he knew it. He then heard Jesus say to the angels, "Martin, as yet only a catechumen, has covered me with his cloak."[1] Sulpicius Severus, the saint's friend and biographer, says that as a consequence of this vision Martin "flew to be baptized."

    When Martin was about twenty, some Teutonic tribes invaded Gaul, and with his comrades he went before the Emperor Julian[2] to receive a war-bounty. Suddenly he was moved to refuse it. "Up to now," he said to Julian, "I have served you as a soldier; allow me henceforth to serve Christ. Give the bounty to these others who are going out to battle. I am a soldier of Christ and it is not lawful for me to fight." Julian, angered, accused Martin of cowardice; the young man replied that he was ready to go into battle the next day unarmed, and advance alone against the enemy in the name of Christ. He was taken off to prison, but discharged as soon as a truce had been made. He then went down to Poitiers, where the renowned Hilary had been bishop for many years. Hilary gladly received this early "conscientious objector" and ordained him deacon.

    Having heard in a dream a summons to revisit his home, Martin crossed the Alps, and from Milan went over to Pannonia. There he converted his mother and some other persons; his father he could not win. While in Illyricum he took sides against the Arians with so much zeal that he was publicly scourged and forced to leave. Back in Italy once more, on his way to Gaul, he learned that the Gallic Church was also under attack by the Arians, and that his good friend Hilary had been banished. He remained at Milan, but soon the Arian bishop, Auxentius, drove him away. Martin took refuge with a priest on the island of Gallinaria, in the gulf of Genoa, and stayed there until Hilary returned to Poitiers in 360. It had become Martin's desire to pursue his religious calling in solitude, and Hilary gave him a small piece of land in central France, now called Liguge. He was joined by other hermits and holy men, and the community grew into a monastery, the first, it is said, to be founded in Gaul. It survived until 1607; in 1852 it was rebuilt by the Benedictines of Solesmes.

    For ten years Martin lived there, directing the life of his disciples and preaching in outlying places. Many miracles were attributed to him. About the year 371, Lidorius, bishop of Tours, died, and the people demanded Martin in his place. Martin was so reluctant to accept the office that they resorted to stratagem and called him to the city to give his blessing to a sick person, then forcibly conveyed him to the church. When neighboring bishops were summoned to confirm this choice, they thought the monk's poor and unkempt appearance proved him unfit for the office, but they were overruled by the acclamations of the local clergy and the people. Even as a bishop, Martin lived an austere life. Unable to endure the constant interruptions, he retired from Tours to a retreat that was later to become the famous abbey of Marmoutier. The site was enclosed by a steep cliff on one side and by a tributary of the Loire River on the other. Here Martin and some of the monks who followed him built cells of wood; others lived in caves dug out of the rock. In a short time their number grew, with many men of high rank among them. From this time on bishops were frequently chosen from Marmoutier, for the holy Martin took the greatest pains in the training of priests.

    Martin's piety and preaching resulted in the decline of paganism in that part of Gaul. He destroyed temples and felled trees which the heathen held sacred. Once when he had demolished a certain temple, he proceeded to the cutting down of a pine tree that stood near. The chief priest and other pagans there offered to cut it down themselves, on condition that he who trusted so strongly in his God would stand under it wherever they would place him. The bishop agreed and allowed himself to be tied and placed on the side towards which the tree was leaning. Just as it seemed about to fall on him, he made the sign of the cross, at which the tree fell in the other direction. Another time, as he was pulling down a temple in the vicinity of Autun, a crowd of pagans fell on him in fury, one brandishing a sword. Martin stood and bared his breast, at sight of which the armed man fell backwards, and in terror begged forgiveness. These marvels are narrated by Sulpicius Severus, who also describes various revelations and visions with which Martin was favored.

    Once a year the bishop visited each of his parishes, traveling on foot, or by donkey or boat. He continued to set up monastic communities, and extended the bounds of his episcopate from Touraine to such distant points as Chartres, Paris, Autun, and Vienne. At Vienne, according to his biographer, he cured Paulinus of Nola of a disease of the eyes. When a brutal imperial officer, Avitianus, arrived at Tours with a band of prisoners he planned to torture to death on the following day, Martin, on being informed of this, hurried in from Marmoutier to intercede for them. Reaching the city near midnight, he went straight to the quarters of Avitianus and did not leave until the officer promised mercy to his captives.

    The churches of other parts of Gaul and in Spain were being disturbed by the Priscillianists, an ascetic sect, named for its leader, Priscillian, bishop of Avila. A synod held at Bordeaux in 384 had condemned his doctrines, but he had appealed to Emperor Maximus. Meanwhile, Ithacius, the orthodox bishop of Ossanova, had attacked him and urged the emperor to have him put to death. Neither Ambrose at Milan, however, nor Martin at Tours would hold communion with Ithacius or his supporters, because they had appealed to the emperor in a dispute over doctrine, and now were trying to punish a heretic with death. Martin wrote to reprove Ithacius severely. It was sufficient, he said, that Priscillian should be branded as a heretic and excommunicated by the bishops. Maximus, yielding to Martin's remonstrances, ordered the trial deferred and even promised that there should be no bloodshed, but afterwards he was persuaded to turn the case over to his prefect Evodius. He found Priscillian and some others guilty on several charges and had them beheaded. At this news, Martin went to Treves to intercede for the lives of all the Spanish Priscillianists who were threatened with a bloody persecution, and also for two men under suspicion as adherents of the late Emperor Gratian. As a condition before granting this request, Maximus stipulated that Martin should resume communion with the intolerant Ithacius and his party. Since they were not excommunicated, this was no violation of any canon, and he accordingly promised the emperor that he would do so, provided the emperor would pardon the two partisans of Gratian and recall the military tribunes he had sent to Spain. The next day Martin received the Sacrament with the Ithacians in order to save so many people from slaughter; yet he was afterwards troubled in conscience as to whether he had been too yielding. For their part in the affair both the emperor and Ithacius were censured by Pope Siricius. It was the first judicial death sentence for heresy, and it had the effect of spreading Priscillianism in Spain.

    Martin had premonitions of his approaching death and predicted it to his disciples, who besought him not to leave them. "Lord," he prayed, "if Thy people still need me, I will not draw back from the work. Thy will be done." When his final sickness came upon him, he was at Candes, in a remote part of his diocese. The monks entreated him to allow them at least to put a sheet under him and make his last hours comfortable. "It becomes not a Christian," said Martin, "to die otherwise than upon ashes. I shall have sinned if I leave you any other example." He lay with eyes and hands raised to Heaven, until the brothers begged him to turn on one side to rest his body a little. "Allow me, my brethren," he answered, "to look towards Heaven rather than to earth, that my soul may be ready to take its flight to the Lord."

    On November 8 he died, and three days later was buried at Tours. Two thousand monks and nuns gathered for his funeral. His successor built a chapel over his grave, which was replaced by a fine basilica. A still later church on this site was destroyed during the French Revolution, but a modern one has since been built there. Throughout the Middle Ages, the knightly Martin, who shared his cloak with a beggar, was the subject of innumerable anecdotes, which expressed the love and veneration of the people. His tomb became a national shrine in France, of which country he is patron saint, and one of the most popular pilgrimage places of Europe. St. Martin is patron of the cities of Wurtburg and Buenos Aires. Many churches in France and elsewhere have been dedicated to him. His emblems are a tree, armor, a cloak, and a beggar.


    Endnotes

    1 The building where St. Martin's cloak was preserved as a precious relic came to be known as the <capella>, from the Latin word for cloak, <cappa>; and from <capella> is derived our word "chapel."

    2 On Julian, see above, <St. Athanasius>. n. IO.


    Saint Martin of Tours, Bishop, Confessor. Celebration of Feast Day is November 11. Taken from "Lives of Saints", Published by John J. Crawley & Co., Inc.

    Thursday, November 10, 2011

    Today we remember St. Leo the Great, Pope and Doctor of the Church

    Pope Leo the Great

    Today is the feast day of St. Leo the Great, pope and Doctor of the Church. The place and date of his birth are unknown but, according to the “Liber Pontificalis”, Leo was a native of Tuscany. Historical information confirms that Leo was a deacon of the Roman Church under Pope Celestine I and that after a successful mission in Gaul he was chosen to be the successor of Pope Sixtus III. Leo was consecrated on 29 September 440 and governed the Church for the next twenty-one years.

    During his papacy, Leo’s goal was the unity of the Church and he dedicated himself to combat the heresy that threatened the church unity. His whole work aimed to raise the prestige of the Holy See before the entire world, to restore a strict ecclesiastical discipline in a time when the rules of morality were being seriously violated. (Source)

    Let us Pray:

    God our Father,
    you will never allow the power of hell
    to prevail against your Church,
    founded on the rock of the apostle Peter.
    Let the prayers of Pope Leo the Great
    keep us faithful to your truth
    and secure in your peace.
    We ask this through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son,
    who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit,
    one God, for ever and ever.

    Monday, November 07, 2011

    Priests in the Home

    Fr. Nicolas Schwizer

    In the era of the first Christians, all church life developed in the homes since there were no temples as such. The entire family would convert and would form part of the Church. Today, we once again become aware of this very important reality. Through baptism and the sacrament of matrimony, Christ himself is present in each Christian home, and from there carries out his saving task: He heals, blesses, transforms, guides and educates his people on their way to Salvation.

    In the Second Vatican Council document, we read: “in this type of domestic church, the parents should be – for the children – the first preachers of the faith through the Word and example, and should foster the sacred vocation” (Lumen Gentium, II).

    Our first church experience is our very own home. There we learn to believe, to love God and our brothers and sisters. There we develop as persons. In the bosom of the home we find God who dwells in our midst. Through baptism, we participate in the prophetic, priestly and real mission of Christ; through the sacrament of matrimony, we participate as a couple, and Christ himself acts through us, sanctifying our family.

    Both the father and the mother participate in the teaching, priesthood and shepherding of Christ. They are the first catechists and formers of the Christian faith.

    The Church, in its magisterial (teaching) function, has the mission to transmit the faith, to watch over the traditions and truths of the Church. Christ has revealed to us the truth about the Father and has shown us the significance of man himself.

    This has been secured throughout the centuries by means of the traditions which cultivated and helped to bring the aforementioned Christian truths to life. It is our task as families “to watch over” so that our children grow in the aforementioned tradition and are able to continue it.

    Since our children are constantly bombarded by a secularist and not very Christian environment, today, more than ever, we need clarity in regard to Christian truths and customs. We want to be catechists, educators in the values and Christian customs for our children. Thus the question as to how much time we dedicate to our catechist formation.

    What is not known, is not experienced and cannot be taught. A great problem is religious ignorance which has caused the proliferation of innumerable Christian and non-Christian sects which slowly undermine our faith.

    The family – today more than ever – has a fundamental role in the transmission of the faith. It would do us good as a couple to take the catechism and begin to read together the parts which interest us most. It would have to transform itself into our “kill the donkeys.”

    We could also ask ourselves how we cultivate our love for the Church in our home: reading God’s word, our conversations concerning the faith, how do we make use of the catechism times for our children’s confirmation and first communion.

    Our challenge is to conquer our legacy. We have to take into the future what we have inherited from our grandparents. What did they leave us? What you have inherited from your parents, make it your own so that you may truly possess it.

    May those valuable goods of the Catholic faith become our intimate and most personal possession; otherwise, nothing will be secure in us nor in our family, nor will we be prepared against the worldly and demonic spirit.

    Questions for reflection

    1. Do we keep up with the catechism of our children?

    2. Am I a Christian because of custom, tradition?

    Sunday, November 06, 2011

    Breaking Bad Liturgical Habits

    Author: George Weigel | Source: Crisis Magazine

    The long-awaited introduction of the new translation of the Roman Missal on November 27, the First Sunday of Advent, offers the Church in the Anglophere an opportunity to reflect on the riches of the liturgy, its biblical vocabulary, and its virtually inexhaustible storehouse of images. Much of that vocabulary, and a great many of those images, were lost under the “dynamic equivalence” theory of translation; they have now been restored under the “formal equivalence” method of translating. Over the next years and decades, the Catholic Church will be reminded of just what a treasure-house of wonders the liturgy is.

    At the same time, the “changes in the words” offer the Church a golden opportunity to confront, and then break, some bad liturgical habits that have accumulated, like unlovely barnacles on the barque of Peter, over the past several decades.

    For example:

    1. Holy Mass should never begin with a greeting or an injunction that is not in the Roman Missal. The first words the congregation hears from the celebrant should be the liturgical words of greeting prescribed in the Sacramentary. At Masses where there is no sung entrance hymn, the admonition “please stand” should never be heard; if the priest-celebrant (or lector) recites the Entrance Antiphon in an audible voice before processing to the altar, everyone will get the message that Mass has begun, and will stand without being told to do so.

    2. Far too many lectors, including many of the best, begin the responsorial psalm inappropriately, saying, “The responsorial psalm is….” – and then reciting the antiphon to the psalm, which is not “the responsorial psalm” but its antiphon. The phrase “The responsorial psalm is….” should thus be put under the ban. Forty-plus years into the liturgical renewal, there is no need to do anything except intone or recite the antiphon that begins the responsorial psalm: by now, the congregation surely knows that their next task is to repeat the antiphon, either in song or by recitation.

    3. Fully aware that I shall be accused by some of crankiness bordering on misanthropy, let me repeat a point made in this space before: the exchange of peace is not meant to be the occasion for a chat with the neighbors, but for the greetings of those closest to us in church with a simple, evangelical salutation: “the peace of the Lord be with you;” “peace be with you;” “the peace of Christ.” The longer conversations can be saved for the narthex or vestibule (not “gathering space”).

    4. The Communion antiphon, typically linked to the Gospel of the day, is just as typically AWOL at Mass. If it is not sung by the choir, it should be recited prior to the distribution of Holy Communion, not afterwards, as if it were some sort of afterthought.

    5. Then there is silence. The rubrics prescribe various periods of silent reflection at Mass, particularly after the reception of Holy Communion, so that the “still, small voice” of 1 Kings 19.12 (butchered by the New American Bible into “tiny whispering sound”) might be heard. This is not a matter of doing something differently just to do something differently; it is a recognition that, in the liturgy, God speaks to us through silence as well as through vocal prayer and Scripture. Reintroducing periods of silence into the liturgy will require explanation from the pulpit; but while priests and deacons are explaining the “new words,” why not explain why the Church chooses silence over words at some points in its worship?

    The re-sacralization of the English used in the liturgy affords all of us an opportunity to ponder just what it is we are doing at Holy Mass: we are participating, here and now, in the liturgy of angels and saints that goes on constantly around the Throne of Grace where the Holy Trinity lives in a communion of radical self-gift and receptivity. This is, in short, serious business, even as it is joyful business. We should do it well, as the grace of God has empowered us to do it well.

    George Weigel’s column is distributed by the Denver Catholic Register, the official newspaper of the Archdiocese of Denver.

    Saturday, November 05, 2011

    Catholic writer attributes same-sex attraction to the Evil One, then apologizes and quits

    Brethren, Peace and Good to you in Jesus Christ. This, according to Religion News:

    dan_avilaThe Boston Pilot, the official newspaper of the Archdiocese of Boston, issued a retraction and apology on Wednesday for a column that blamed the devil for homosexuality.

    The column waswritten by Daniel Avila, a Washington, D.C., lawyer, who is also a policy advisor for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops Subcommittee for the Promotion and Defense of Marriage.

    The U.S. bishops have made preventing the legalization of gay marriage a top priority, and Avila's column raises questions about whether his view is shared by other Catholic officials. A spokesperson for the USCCB said the conference will not comment beyond the statements issued by Avila and the Pilot.

    The Pilot apologized for "having failed to recognize the theological error in the column before publication." It did not say what the theological error is.

    Avila also apologized, saying his column was not approved by the USCCB, as it should have been. He also apologized "for the hurt and confusion that this column has caused."

    See here for more details on this story: http://wapo.st/tRmrzS

    Below is  Avila's original column.

    More than once I have heard from or about Catholics upset with the Church for its insistence that sexual relations be limited to marriage between husband and wife. Does not this moral rule force people with same-sex attraction into lives of loneliness? If they are born that way, then why should they be punished by a restriction that does not account for their pre-existing condition? God wants everyone to be happy, and for persons with same-sex attraction is not their happiness to be found in the fulfillment of that attraction? Some seek to change the Church's teaching on marriage or have left the Church because of it. They believe either that God through the Church ignores the needs of people or that the Church misunderstands what God desires.

    That is, if God causes same-sex attraction, and yet commands that it not be satisfied, then this is divine cruelty. Or, if God causes same-sex attraction, then it must be the divine will that those with the attraction should act on it and it is the Church that is being cruel in its teaching or at the very least tragically mistaken about what God wants. In either case, the belief that the Church is wrong on this issue starts from a faulty premise. God does not cause same-sex attraction.

    The best natural evidence of what God causes and wants for us is our genetic code. Science has isolated certain genetic combinations that are typical to human creation and development. The most basic and the first genetic expression is that which occurs at our conception, when at the same time our individual human life begins our sexual identity as male or female begins. That which is genetically encoded, for believers, points to a codifier, and communicates through its design the codifier's intent. Interpreting from a spiritual perspective the genetic code which supplies our sexual difference, we have to conclude that God wants us to be male or female.

    No one has found a "gay gene." Identical twins are always, of course, the same sex, providing further proof of male and female genes. If there was a gay gene, then when one twin exhibits same-sex attraction, his or her identical sibling should too. But that is not the case. The incidence of finding identical twins with identical same-sex attraction is relatively rare and certainly not anywhere near one hundred percent. Something other than the hardwiring found in the genetic code must explain the variance.

    So what causes the inclination to same-sex attraction if it appears early and involuntarily and "who," if anyone, is responsible? In determining the answer to the "what" question, the most widely accepted scientific hypothesis points to random imbalances in maternal hormone levels and identifies their disruptive prenatal effects on fetal development as the likely and major cause.

    The most recent and most comprehensive discussion of this research is found in a book published earlier this year by a scientist who also happens to be a gay-rights advocate. Even though it discounts other environmental factors that other scientists believe also may play a role, Simon LeVay's publication, "Gay, Straight and the Reason Why: The Science of Sexual Attraction" is worth the read.

    LeVay is not interested in the "who" question and describes same-sex attraction as just a variation among other human inclinations. Catholics do not have the luxury of being materialists. We look for ultimate explanations that transcend the strictly physical world and that stretch beyond our limited ability to mold and reshape reality as we know it. Disruptive imbalances in nature that thwart encoded processes point to supernatural actors who, unlike God, do not have the good of persons at heart.

    In other words, the scientific evidence of how same-sex attraction most likely may be created provides a credible basis for a spiritual explanation that indicts the devil. Any time natural disasters occur, we as people of faith look back to Scripture's account of those angels who rebelled and fell from grace. In their anger against God, these malcontents prowl about the world seeking the ruin of souls. They continue to do all they can to mar, distort and destroy God's handiwork.

    Therefore, whenever natural causes disturb otherwise typical biological development, leading to the personally unchosen beginnings of same-sex attraction, the ultimate responsibility, on a theological level, is and should be imputed to the evil one, not God. Applying this aspect of Catholic belief to interpret the scientific data makes more sense because it does not place God in the awkward position of blessing two mutually incompatible realities -- sexual difference and same-sex attraction.

    If in fact this analysis of causation and culpability is correct, then it opens new perspectives on the Church's teaching in this area. Being born with an inclination which originates in a manner outside of one's control is not sufficient proof that the condition is caused by God or that its satisfaction meets God's purpose. Furthermore, a proper understanding of who is really at fault should deepen our compassion towards those who experience same-sex attraction and inform our response to the question of loneliness. Ultimately, an accurate attribution of responsibility for same-sex attraction frees us to consider more fully the urgent question of why sexual difference matters so much to God. These matters will be addressed in my next column.

    Daniel Avila formerly served the Catholic Bishops in Massachusetts and now lives and works in the Washington, D.C., area.

    Below is Avila’s apology from this source:

    "Statements made in my column, 'Some fundamental questions on same-sex attraction' of October 28, do not represent the position of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and the column was not authorized for publication as is required policy for staff of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. The teaching of Sacred Scripture and of the Catechism of the Catholic Church make it clear that all persons are created in the image and likeness of God and have inviolable dignity. Likewise, the Church proclaims the sanctity of marriage as the permanent, faithful, fruitful union of one man and one woman. The Church opposes, as I do too, all unjust discrimination and the violence against persons that unjust discrimination inspires. I deeply apologize for the hurt and confusion that this column has caused."

    Commentary. Ouch! Definitely a subject that cannot be tackled in only 900 words in a diocesan newspaper. The subject is very delicate and deserving of a longer, more sober treatment elsewhere.

    Which is to say that I agree with that Avila’s theological thesis needs further treatment, refinement, and exploration and also with the contents of his apology which in no way retracted the proposed thesis, btw.  If he had specified that people suffering from same-sex attraction are not deprived from the access to God’s grace and are still endowed with natural human rights like the rest of us sinners suffering from wounds, personal failure, and flesh-thorns, the column may have passed muster.

    Friday, November 04, 2011

    Haiku to my father


    T’was the last autumn
    of his sunset years – yes,
    now I am orphaned.