Folks, this according to LifeSiteNews.Com:
Bill Forcing Compliance with Gay Ceremonies Passes Irish Lower House
By Hilary White
DUBLIN, July 5, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – On July 1st, Ireland’s Civil Partnership Bill completed its passage through the Dail (Lower House) without a vote.
Under the bill, civil registrars could face a fine of €2,000 (U.S. $2500) and up to six months in prison for conscientiously refusing to carry out a ceremony for a homosexual couple. Similar penalties are outlined for anyone refusing for reasons of conscience to rent meeting facilities for homosexual partnership ceremonies.
The bill would create a near-equivalent situation to marriage for same-sex partners in terms of property, social welfare, succession, maintenance, pensions and taxes.
In March, the Catholic bishops said in a statement that these provisions are a violation of the Irish constitution’s protections of religious freedom and the family based on marriage. It creates “a new and dangerous expansion of State power. Conscientious Catholics, Protestants, Muslims or Jews are effectively being told by the Irish State that they need not apply for a position as a Civil Registrar,” the bishops’ statement said.
But politicians and civil liberties groups both shunned the warning and said the Catholic Church has no business making any statements on public policy.
Justice Minister Dermot Ahern told the Irish Times in a June 12 interview that religious beliefs “cloud” the judgment of politicians. Green party leader John Gormley said the Church should exclusively look after the “spiritual needs of its flock,” adding that he “thought we had left the era of Church interference behind.”
Mark Kelly, director of the Irish Council for Civil Liberties said, “The ICCL seriously doubts that the Irish Catholic bishops retain sufficient moral authority to pontificate on the Civil Partnership Bill.”
Homosexualist activists complained that the bill does not go far enough, saying it needs a clause allowing same-sex partners with custody of children to be legally recognized as “joint parents.”
Critics have said that the bill is contrary to the intention of the Irish constitution, which specifically protects marriage as the foundation of the family. Article 41 states, “The State pledges itself to guard with special care the institution of marriage, on which the Family is founded.” The constitution also recognizes “the family as the natural primary and fundamental unit group of society, and as a moral institution possessing inalienable and imprescriptible rights, antecedent and superior to all positive law.”
“The state, therefore, guarantees to protect the family in its constitution and authority, as the necessary basis of social order and as indispensable to the welfare of the nation and the state.”
The National Men’s Council of Ireland and the Family Rights and Responsibilities Institute of Ireland have said that their representations to politicians on the bill were ignored.
In a letter to President Mary McAleese, Roger Eldridge, chairman of the National Men’s Council of Ireland, said, “We believe this legislation will act contrary to the common good of the Irish people, will undermine the family founded on marriage, which is ‘indispensable to the welfare of the nation and the state,’ and is therefore repugnant to the constitution.”
The homosexualist lobby has made huge strides very quickly in Ireland, where ten years ago “gay rights” were a non-issue in politics. Despite lack of interest in the issue among the general public, since 2001 the Irish media began to give increasingly favorable attention to the movement. By the 2007 general election, all parties had included support for homosexual civil unions, with Sinn Féin and the Green Party supporting full civil “marriage.”
With more sympathetic media exposure, the homosexualist cause has also started receiving greater public support. In 2008 a poll showed that 84% of Irish people supported civil marriage or civil partnerships for homosexuals, with 58% supporting gay “marriage” in registry offices.
Commentary. St. Patrick may have driven the snakes from Ireland but now they are back in force. Needless to say, we – the Church – are to blame for much of it. The two generations that the Catholic Church lost in Ireland due to the egregious scandal of physical, sexual, and homosexual abuse perpetrated upon so many innocents by so many priests and religious is now in power and they want little to do with the Church.
This new sunset of anti-Catholic hostility and indifferentism has turned Ireland into a fertile land for the resurgence of Paganism and its attendant recognition of deviancy as a valid form of sexual expression and its practitioners as a protected class. That’s why Mark Kelly, director of the Irish Council for Civil Liberties, rejoices at the deficit of moral authority suffered by the Irish bishops.
But just because the Irish Church faces a crisis of moral authority doesn’t mean that the bishops are wrong about the legal, social, and moral ramifications of same-sex “marriage”. The thing is, the proponents know they have the upper hand as the larger populace wants to punish the Church's misdeeds through their total indifference. Besides, homosexualists can be shrill while the Church cannot. That’s why they’ll win this battle.
Let us then pray again for Ireland, and through the intercession of St. Patrick, may the Lord drive again the snakes from the blessed Emerald Isle and that the sunset of Paganism gives way to a new dawn of Jesus Christ.
DUBLIN, July 5, 2010 (









1 comments:
This is a sad situation, but not confined to Ireland. The in-roads that many secular activist groups have made are by simple linguistics. By changing the "meaning" of a word i.e. marriage, they challenge who is defined as "married". In a politically correct world, an absolute definition no longer applies, but is simply what one group or another wishes it to be. That opens up the entire Bible to question and suddenly, God's laws no longer make sense to a modern world.
The recent abuse challenges in the Church are the devil's distractions. They are serious and must be dealt with by making changes and adding safeguards that actually work, but if the Church feels intimidated to stand on moral ground for a lost world, then who will stand up? There will be something to take its place and it won't be good.
In the case of gay rights, not only do gays deserve to be treated with love and respect like anyone else, but they also deserve to be told the truth in a loving way, because each and every soul is at stake. Society is not telling them the "Truth". If the Church does not stand up for the Truth, then who will?
It will take alot of courage to stay focused on the goal, but that is how secular society is getting their message across. Men can destroy the body, but the devil destroys both body and soul. By the Church looking exclusively at the spiritual needs of its flock, it is protecting the soul, but it can't do that unless the Truth is spoken, and the Old and New Testament is clear.
Further, if a country's very existence and its fundamental laws are founded on those truths, then people must be reminded of that because they have forgotten their history.
Linda Smith
Florida
Post a Comment