Folks, in reference to my previous post, "Progressive" New Zealand Church Offends Christians Worldwide, some of you may be asking why am I so upset about this and why I think this is such a big deal. Let me explain.I understand humor, satire, caricature, and the like. I also know that humor is in the eye of the beholder. What is a joke to some may be an insult to others.
When the Simpsons ran a satire of Dan Brown and Lisa became a nun in a local Springfield convent to "break the code" and the front door of the convent had a sticker of a screaming Virgin Mary saying "scram," I laughed - perhaps I shouldn't have, but I did. We Catholics can laugh at ourselves, we're not mullahs after all. But when South Park took aim at her menses I didn't.
When I read the joke with the punch line "God is a hard act to follow" I also laughed and thought that, as written and as intended, it DOES make a sane, healthy, and correct doctrinal point. But when the punch line was scribbled over a picture of Our Lady in bed looking flustered and Joseph looking frustrated, I didn't laugh for one second.
What's the difference?
You see, in this day and age when exhibitionism and voyeurism is the order of the day, and everything is sexualized, we lose sight of the fact that sex, to a Christian, is a sacred act. Yet, the Master himself stated that the most excellent way is to refrain from marriage for the sake of the Kingdom.
We Catholics believe, and think that Scripture does support, the notion that Mary and Joseph decided for elected chastity and virginity without losing sight of the excellence of marital relations. They just moved beyond them. Their sexual abstinence has nothing do with sexual repression, but with love, albeit another kind of love, possible only by God's grace. And God's grace is given quietly, in silence, and intimately, in a way that the pruriently curious will never understand or accept.
Elected virginity is also a escathological sign, that is, it points to the Parousia, the End of Time. It's a mark of a people who underwent one Advent season and then fell in the throes of another, definitive Advent for which this ongoing season is just but a preparation and a reminder. We are a people of the First and Second Advents and many await them by sacrificing their procreative powers for the sake of that Kingdom that is both to come and within us.
The offending billboard was a fragrant attempt to pry into the mystery of this grace; it turned the marital bed of Mary and Joseph into a circus freak act; it aimed to destroy the very mystery present in a unique marriage in the history of man. It was also an attempt to destroy the mystery by soiling it in such away as to make perversely disgusting the mere thought that there is such a thing, such a vocation, such a grace as elected virginity.
I, in turn, find the blatant inversion of values perpetrated by this "church" despicable and disgusting in itself. Their point about the true meaning of Christmas could have been made a thousand different ways without bringing the God of Israel to the level of Zeus and without stressing the biological so much in order to make the Incarnation and its consequences - to Mary, Joseph, to the rest of us - trivial and unimportant.
This is why I find this thing so offensive, hurtful, and degrading, not only to Those portrayed, but also for the rest of us who have to suffer it.
Shame on the perpetrators. May the Lord forgive them; and may the Lord grant me the grace to forgive them now, at this very moment.










12 comments:
I want to see if I understand this correctly. According to the Catholic Church, Joseph and Mary never ever had sex? Not even after Jesus was born? She died a virgin?
You understand correctly. Oh, and although she most probably did die, she's no longer dead. She's alive, body and soul, as alive as you and me, but more so.
It's not just the Catholics that believe that, by the way. The Orthodox believe this. Luther believed this also, though Lutherans today have strayed from this belief.
Wikipedia, while not a great reference for religious matters, has some adequate coverage on this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_virginity_of_Mary
St Matthew's gives up on billboard after knife slashing:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10616487
"Oh, and although she most probably did die, she's no longer dead."
Just a side point: the Byzantine Liturgy (which is acknowledged as part of the patrimony of the Catholic Church) definitely says she did die and that she was resurrected by her Son.
As a New Zealander I am deeply saddened and ashamed that we as a nation have offended our Holy Mother - I can only beg Her forgiveness - and offer reparation. Dear Father God what have we done.
"An Auckland Anglican church decided last night to take down its controversial Christmas billboard after an elderly woman slashed it with a knife - the third attack in two days.
St Matthew-in-the-City vicar Archdeacon Glynn Cardy said he was worried that people could be injured if there were any further attacks on the picture of Mary and Joseph in bed after sex.
The billboard went up on Thursday morning. It was covered in paint about six hours later and then went missing overnight. A replacement version was knifed yesterday evening.
Earlier, the parish defended the billboard, even though the (Anglican) Bishop of Auckland, John Paterson, had slammed it as "insensitive" and said he was disappointed at St Matthew's decision to continue with the display."
Thank you, Brian for this piece of news. It is sad to say, though, that the Vicar and his "archdeacon" remained unrepentant at their little "joke." May God have mercy on their souls.
Noel: New Zealand is blessed to have Christians like you. Do not despair, we have overcome the world in Him.
Orthocath: I'm aware of the Byzantine position on the Dormition of Our Lady. Although I myself lean that way, the dogmatic definition on the Assumption left the matter open and I'm constrained by its wording.
And Eastern Catholics are not similarly constrained? :) Does an argument from silence (the lack of mention of death in the Catholic dogmatic definition of the Assumption from 1854) mean the Catholic Church has no position on the matter even though all the Eastern Catholic liturgies proclaim her death and resurrection? Is the patrimony of Catholic Church only in the West?
Orthocath: the questions you ask are all logical. I wish I can solve it your way but I can't. In fact, although I have my opinion on the matter, I ultimately can't decide anything binding for the Church one way or another. Let us pray that the day may soon come that those who can may meet, agree, and then Break Bread together at last.
Thanks, Teofilo. I should never blog before coffee as I said 1854 instead of 1950. The Apostolic Constitution for the dogmatic definition refers to the death of the Theotokos in several places:
http://www.catholicplanet.com/CMA/dormition-summary.htm
Joining you in prayers for unity.
Post a Comment