I am not going to mention any names. That's not my style. However, I've received first-hand information that a bishop of a small U.S. diocese, during the weekly diocesan TV broadcast, discouraged a curious young interviewer to even attend the Tridentine Mass, even asserting that the motu proprio only applied to "preexisting groups." Since no such groups currently exist, His Excellency reasons that the motu proprio doesn't apply to him. The fact that he has bent over backwards to prohibit the celebration of the Tridentine Latin Mass in his diocese and to sideline those Catholics who express a legitimate pastoral need to worship in that rite, forcing those Catholics to go elsewhere to receive spiritual sustenance according to their needs and temperament, remained unaddressed. In other words, said bishop is the reason why there are no indulted Tridentine Latin Masses celebrated in his diocese and now feels that the motu proprio reinforces his stance.
I am not a canonist or a liturgist. In my defense, I will say that I can read and follow an argument and based on that alone, I humbly submit that the bishop is wrong. His reading of the motu proprio contradicts both the spirit and the letter of this document, as well as the expressed desires of the Holy Father on this matter.
The fact of the matter is that, in my opinion, the motu proprio wrestled away from the bishops the power to grant or withold permission to celebrate the now extraordinary form of the Liturgy from priests of the Latin Rite under their jurisdiction. Without wishing to lecture bishops, I humbly submit that the motu proprio represents a direct appeal to all bishops to change their mindsets and attitudes regarding the celebration of this rite. Bishops are bound to think "How do I make this happen and sustain it" and not "What canonical or liturgical subterfuges I still can utilize to derail the celebration of the extraordinary form of the Latin Rite."
The motu proprio is clear: all priests of the Latin Rite are free to celebrate this extraordinary form of the Eucharist, and groups of the Catholic faithful wishing to worship in said rite are free to come together, worship, and associate around it. I humbly submit that any other interpretation that undermines this basic finding is untrue to the wishes of the Holy Father. What is left for bishops and other local ordinaries to do is to ensure that the extraordinary form of the Latin Rite be celebrated appropriatedly and knowingly. Although I recognize that this might take some time as interested priests face a training curve to learn or relearn the old rubrics, unsympathetic bishops should not take advantage of the situation to enact liturgical and canonical requirements that would, in fact, stop the celebration of the Mass of Blessed John XXIII in their dioceses for the foreseable future.
Canon 212, ss 3 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law, which is now part of Vivificat's mission statement, declares:
Christ's faithful have the right, indeed at times the duty, in keeping with their knowledge, competence and position, to manifest to the sacred Pastors their views on matters which concern the good of the Church. They have the right also to make their views known to others of Christ's faithful, but in doing so they must always respect the integrity of faith and morals, show due reverence to the Pastors and take into account both the common good and the dignity of individuals.The motu proprio itself exhorts the faithful to notify Rome in case of local inaction.
Where am I going with this? Let us pray that the Holy Spirit continues to enlighten our bishops and that our bishops be docile to the promptings of that same Spirit and in the same spirit of prayer and humility, I exhort my fellow Catholics who prefer to worship under this liturgical form to have their pens or word processors ready and ask from their Pastors that their individual dignity and pastoral needs be satisfied, all in a spirit of respect and reverence and Christian charity.









0 comments:
Post a Comment